Day: September 4, 2026

Mississippi Rule 7.1 bars communications that are false, misleading, deceptive or unfair. What an accurate but unfair law firm website looks like.

Kansas KRPC 7.1 covers whatever your AI assistant says. How to review a website feature that has no fixed text, and why Rule 226 became Rule 240.

Maine Rule 7.2-A sets aspirational goals for lawyer advertising. Why the one rule you cannot be disciplined for breaking still shapes your site.

Montana does not adopt the explanatory comments most states rely on. How to reason about a law firm website from the rule text alone.

West Virginia keeps the unjustified-expectation and comparison rules in its black-letter text. What that means for your results page.

New Mexico rule 16-701 reaches lawyers who elicit or endorse misleading communications. What that means for how your firm collects reviews.

Nebraska rule 3-507.1 catches design that implies action is required when it is not. What that means for countdown timers and urgency copy.

Iowa rule 32:7.2(d) requires a lawyer responsible for the content of every communication. What that means when your agency wrote the site.

Conspicuous is not a property of your HTML. It is a property of what renders on the phone in the reader’s hand.

“Our attorneys” is a claim about headcount. On a solo website it is a false one, and it arrived from a template.