Category: Law Firm Web Design

Nashville is drawing out-of-state firms fast, which makes Rule 7.5 – firm names, offices and of counsel – the provision that actually matters in Tennessee.

Maryland renumbered its rules, so every checklist keyed to Rule 7.1 silently skips it and reports nothing rather than a gap. Plus the three-jurisdiction DC metro problem.

South Carolina is a filing state with prescriptive content rules, and the most consistently overlooked strict jurisdiction in the country. Strictness does not track market size.

Utah built a supervised regulatory sandbox where Arizona deregulated outright. The two states are the entire evidence base for where US legal regulation is heading.

Massachusetts has a powerful consumer protection statute with a private right of action sitting alongside its ethics rules. Why that changes how you assess marginal claims.

Michigan advertising rules are terse, but no-fault reform left a large body of well-ranking content describing superseded law. Stale content is a misleading communication.

Las Vegas injury clients are structurally out-of-state, which means a Nevada firm website is effectively advertising nationally. Plus Nevada is a filing state.

Virginia deregulated attorney advertising in 2017 and is now among the most permissive states. Why that removes the safe harbour rather than the standard.

Louisiana belongs alongside Florida, not in the middle of the pack. Mandatory filing, enumerated content rules, and why older guidance is actively misleading.

Washington consumer health privacy law has a private right of action, and personal injury intake forms collect health data. The open question on every WA law firm website.